[ Studio 04 — Web Design ]

Your site is the largest piece of brand collateral you'll ever ship.

Most agencies treat it as a Webflow template with a brand skin. We design the site as the primary expression of the brand — every typographic decision, every motion, every interaction tested against the bet the strategy made. Then we ship it production-ready, not a Figma file you have to redraw.

Get an audit Book a call from $60–180K · 8–12 weeks
What is web design?

Brand-led web design is the work of designing and shipping the website as the primary expression of the brand — not as a templated CMS skin. Engagements include information architecture, a component-first design system in Figma with engineering tokens, page design (home, about, product, blog, careers), motion and interaction prototypes, mobile-first typography and layout, performance budget locking (LCP, INP, CLS) baked into design decisions, and front-end production build on Next.js, Astro, or Webflow per fit. Mature engagements include CMS integration (Sanity, Contentful, Webflow, Strapi, headless WordPress) and 30-day post-launch review. The deliverable is a working component library and production site — not a Figma file the in-house team has to redraw. Engagement length is typically 8–12 weeks.

[ The problem ]

Why most brand sites underwhelm

Template skinning, not brand expression

Pre-built template + brand color swap + couple of custom hero sections. The result feels like a thousand other SaaS sites. Brand identity does not survive contact with the homepage.

Designed for the deck, not the screen

Mocks look great in the case-study deck. Live site has wonky type sizes, broken mobile patterns, motion that drags on slow connections. The handoff was the failure point.

No system, every page is bespoke

Hero is one off, about page is one-off, careers is one-off. Six months in, the team is rebuilding patterns from scratch. There was never a real component library.

Performance treated as engineering's problem

Designers ship 30MB of unoptimised hero video. LCP is 6 seconds. The brand impression collapses before it loads. Performance is a brand decision, not a build problem.

[ What we do ]

What we run

Information architecture + sitemap

Component-first design system (Figma + tokens)

Page design — home, about, product, blog, careers

Motion + interaction direction with prototypes

Typography + layout system that scales mobile-first

Performance budget (LCP, INP, CLS) baked into design decisions

Front-end build (Next.js, Astro, or Webflow per fit)

CMS + handoff — Sanity, Contentful, or Webflow

[ How we run it ]

Eight to twelve weeks. Designed to be shipped.

01

Architecture + audit

Sitemap, content inventory, performance baseline, analytics audit. We diagnose what's loading wrong, what's missing, and what's redundant before designing anything.

02

System-first design

Component library before pages. Tokens before components. Performance budget locked. Type, color, motion all tested in prototype before any page is mocked.

03

Page composition + content

Pages composed from components. Content drafted alongside layout, not after. Mobile and desktop designed in parallel, not desktop-first-mobile-later.

04

Build + ship

Frontend built by senior engineers. Performance verified live (LCP, INP, CLS). CMS integrated. Handoff includes a working design system, not a Figma file dump.

[ Deliverables ]

What lands in your inbox.

  • Sitemap + IA
  • Component library (Figma) + design tokens (CSS variables)
  • All page designs (mobile + desktop)
  • Motion prototypes (Framer / After Effects / Lottie)
  • Production build in chosen stack (Next.js / Astro / Webflow)
  • CMS integration + content team training
  • Performance verified — Core Web Vitals at green
  • Working handoff doc + 30-day post-launch review
[ Proof ]

Where this worked.

DTC · Furniture · $22M GMV (illustrative)

Site rebuild + 41% lift in mobile conversion

  • Architecture audit found 2.4s LCP on PDP — performance budget locked before page mocks began
  • Component library shipped to in-house team; 14 surfaces composed without studio support
  • 301 strategy preserved organic traffic — no rankings drop in 90-day post-launch window
B2B SaaS · Series-A · $5M ARR (illustrative)

Marketing site replacement on Next.js + Sanity

  • Pricing-page rebuild + comparison table shipped as one component, used across 4 LPs
  • Motion principles documented as easing/duration tokens — engineering shipped consistently in Q3
  • Core Web Vitals at green at launch and held through 6-month measurement window
[ FAQ ]

Questions we actually get asked.

Do you build, or just design?

Both. Design and front-end engineering sit on one team. We've shipped on Next.js, Astro, Remix, and Webflow. We pick the stack to fit the team that maintains it after we leave.

Can you work with our existing CMS?

Yes. We've shipped on Sanity, Contentful, Webflow, Strapi, and headless WordPress. We'll recommend if your current CMS is the constraint, but we don't force a migration to bill.

What if we want to keep our existing site and add only key pages?

Common engagement. We ship a hero refresh, a new product page, or a brand microsite that fits inside your existing system. Cleaner than a full rebuild when budget is tight.

How do you handle SEO continuity?

We audit existing rankings, preserve URL structure where possible, set up 301s for any restructure, and keep your team's SEO operator on the call from week 1. Site rebuilds that lose 30% of traffic are avoidable.